Some Preliminaries
Let me tell you now that as I type I can hear my finger joints creaking.
I think they're whispering "oil can."
That's how rusty I am.
I have been out of practice at this personal write-up thing for almost a year.
I hope it's more like riding a bike, and less like . . . uh . . . something that's hard to remember how to do after an extended period of not doing it.
Well, it seems my simile skills are up to snuff.
Er, what's next?
Yes, I return to the grind- the exhausting, daunting, depressing task of expounding on the character of my friends.
This Reverse quiz will be a re-hash of the oldest story in the world. That is to say, how great Andrew is. Humans have been writing on this subject since they first took charcoal bits to cave walls. That's the level of awesome Andrew has achieved: he pretty much transcends time.
But I'm getting ahead of myself.
I have touched upon the subject of Andrew before in this periodical, a little over two years ago.
You have to scroll down some distance, but it's here:
http://whiteytighties.blogspot.com/2004_07_01_whiteytighties_archive.html
Okay. Just a few quick announcements before we move on to our theatrical portion of the show.
First up is the matter of the Reverse Quiz itself.
Does anyone even remember what exactly is on it? On what scales do I judge you? What juicy tidbits you can expect?
So, before we go any further, let me give you a summary of my quiz formula.
01. I will write something about you. (No less than one paragraph length.)
02. I will then tell what song/movie remind me of you.
03. If I were to apply a time to you, it would be...
04. I will try to name a single word that best describes you. (Or, that failing, a half dozen words.)
05. I'll tell you one of the most memorable moments I've had with you.
06. I will tell you what animal you remind me of.
07. I'll then tell you something that I've always wondered about you.
08. I'll tell you which hanky signal you'd probably go by.
09. I will describe my ideal day with you.
10. I will tell you which villainous character actor you remind me of.
If any of you happen to remember the details of those reverse quizzes that were circulating the blogosphere a year or so ago, you'll notice that I devitated somewhat from the traditional model. So, in an attempt to preemptively halt all questions that I might be bombarded with later, here is a thorough explantaion of each item on my version of the quiz:
1. Self explanatory. Same as errbody else's, but longer than most.
2. I'm big on making things as explicit as possible. Perhaps it comes from the years of being misunderstood and subsequently villified, but whatever the reason, I go out of my way to explain what I say. One fish, two fish. Red fish, blue fish.
As such, when listing the songs you remind me of, I will include a description of the ditty, my reasons for picking it, and, occasionally, specific lyrics. Unlike my illustrious predecessors, I feel you shouldn't have to hunt for specifics on these.There is one other variation from the formula I am including. I realized that in order to do justice to this thing if more than one person is involved, you need to create some sort of similar scale. I needed something which would unite my readers and make them easier to describe. Thus, in addition to telling you which random song or songs you remind me of, I will tell you which Mike Doughty song you remind me of. This way I can capture your personalities more fully.
(One last note for this one: If you think about someone enough, every song you hear, and every movie you see, will remind you of him or her. So, while the tunes and films I pick have some relevance to who you are as a person, I choose them more because you're special to me and I think of you a lot.)
3. I over-did it on this one. When choosing time I picked not only an o'clock, but also a day, season, and month, and, in some cases, year.
4. Impossible. I did my best.
5. Ditto. Also, I probably held back on these.
6. Once again the universal scale approach. Aside from picking assorted animals of varying genus and species for y'all, I picked for each of you a dog that you remind me of.
7. Obviously held back on this one.
8. Yeah, the Hanky Signal.
The Hanky Code was a system of wordless, sartorial communication developed by the gay community, which has spread in limited amounts to the fetish world as a whole. It shows, by the color of the handkerchief you wear and its placement in one of several locations on your person, what your particular kink is. I declined to post explanations for these. Have fun looking them up and remember to clear your history when your done.
You know what's really funny? The code varies!
(I used this one: http://www.fetishexchange.org/hanky.shtml).
9. Might be partially based on actual events.10. You won't know who this is in many cases. Just "role" with it.
Good, I think that wraps it up.
Now, I realize it's been so long that any references to past posts are fairly moot, but here are some additions to an old Rerverse Quiz, Looney Tones, about my perennial Italian-ninja cohort, Anthony Celi.
There are but two items I need to touch on left over from the Tony's post.
The first, sadly, is a negative assessment of the poor fellow. In my write-up of him, though he asked me to take the gloves off and not pull any punches, I said almost nothing about his slightly less appealing character traits. At the time I was so enamored with the guy that I couldn't even see any faults, let alone bring myself to write about them. A few people even commented after reading that they could think of some bothersome qualities Tones possesses, and wondered why I hadn't included any. And so, now, for the sake of closure and completion, I will type about reasons why I do not like Tony. (This is, oddly enough, in spite of the fact that I do like him, and am closer to him now than ever.)
Tony can be stubborn. Annoyingly so. He is capable of digging his heels in further and with more tenacity than anyone I know. (It's as if he wear those ninja climbing foot-spikes all the time . . . in his mind!) One of my biggest problems with Tony is his absolute unyielding nature in the face of peer pressure. This contradicts strongly with his at times too-passive attitude in social situations. If Tony only wants to "go with the flow," God help the individual struggling to get him galvanized enough to make a decision. However, if he has his mind firmly set on something, save yourself hours of your life and give up trying to get him to change it.
Tony is a genius. Literally. Certified and saluted. As such, he has a right to be arrogant. He can, however, becoming sickeningly condescending sometimes. Not usually to me. I don't know if this is because he won't do it directly, or I choose not to see it, or-my favorite- he recognizes me as close to his own intelligence level. But I digress, to people he sees as intellectual inferiors- which is, rightfully- much of the population of planet Earth- he can be superior to the point of callousness. With me, his arrogance occasionally manifests itself in our arguments and debates, especially the petty ones, when he lowers himself to cruel jibes, which, when blended with his already assured air, become intolerable.
A side note from the above: Though this is no fault of Tony's, one thing I cannot stand is knowing more than him. The hierarchy is clear enough to me that any disruption of it becomes almost nauseating. So, if there is a fact Tony is ignorant of, yet I know because of my memory or voracious appetite for reading, it seems, well, just wrong somehow.
Tony is selfish. When it comes to creative collaberations, that is. The skits we wrote, for instance. He dominated them. In fact, to even use "we" to describe the force behind them is absurd. He wrote them. He didn't do it to earn more praise for himself, however. That's the infuriating part. He never wanted any credit for them. It'd be one thing if he pushed me out of the way to bask in the limelight. But as soon as the applause began, Tony tucked himself away in the corner. He does this often. With projects or good deeds. Does all the work, takes none of the credit. It's bothersome mostly because it makes so little sense.
Tony can be fussy and rule-bound. This intrudes in his competence as a host and his duties as a friend. I imagine his reverence for rules and boundaries- which he sometimes abandons to riotous results- is inherited from his parents; conditioned just as my hatred for rules and authority was by mine. Still, it can be discouraging.
For instance, the drinks in his fridge downstairs. Mentality in my house is always, in a lax way, you want something, have it. If my dad bought a bottle of soda for himself and my friends want some, take some. He'll happily buy another. The inherent boundaries of material possessions mean very little. And, in some ways Tony is like this. However, when my brother Sam asks for some cranberry juice, which Tony's parents use- I assume to make drinks- he is not just denied but reprimanded. I realize this is more a side-effect of the specific Celi household mentality, which is neither right nor wrong, merely different from mine, but Tony, as an unyielding instrument of that mentality, gains my scorn and disaffection.
And, at times, for whatever reason, Tony can slip up. We all do. What I mean is, in the very pure qualities that he exemplifies, that define what a magnificient person he is, he falls short. Happens to everyone. For instance: Tony had his house to himself this summer. I came over one night, between 10 and 11 I think it was, with a change of clothes and asked to use his shower. He appeared scandalized, and denied me access to his facilities. I admit, it might have been presumptuous on my part to act as I did. But, thing was, my house was undergoiing renovation and I had only ice-cold water coming out of my taps. I was working full-time in a grungy warehouse then, and just wanted to get clean. For Tony, normally the genial host, to not just deny my request, but appear insulted by it, was as harsh as a slap in the face. If Tony had come to my house, with my parents there, at 3 o'clock in the morning and asked the same of me I'd have drawn his goddamn bath for him.
Continuing in the bathroom theme: He gets angry when one does number two at his house. For fuck sake, it's a toilet! Tony could shit on my kitchen floor and I'd hold off on losing my temper.
. . .
I think that's all I got. What I guess I'm driving at is that Tony is a person and people are complex. Understandable, but nonetheless annoying and hurtful.
But, onto the good things:
Tony is a hard worker. I did not mention this in the his post. I greatly admire anyone who can apply themselves to a task, especially a physical one, and remain diligent. Tony isn't the strongest guy I know, and I tend to think of myself- rugged, powerful, slightly masochistic, with the work-ethic of an ox, as a hard worker. But Tony, in a quiet, unassuming way, can work just as hard and as doggedly as I do.
And the only other thing which needs mentioning is how thrilling it is sometimes to banter with Tony about the most esoteric subect matter imaginable. Whether it's bouncing quotations from Dexter's Lab or Johnny Bravo off one another or discussing obscure Spiderman villains, I cannot express how happy I am that Tony and I function on the same nerd wave-length. Tony is my friend, confidante, and pop-culture geequal, and I value this greatly.
Two final notes on the concept of Reverse Quizzes as a whole:
Note One:
When describing something it is often necessary to compare it to something else. When composing my Friends paragraphs, I held back as much as I could for fear that in complimenting one amigo I would insult the otro. In this series of personal write-ups, however, I have decided to take Caution, douse him in gasoline, light him on fire, piss on the ashes, and throw him to the wind. So, fair warning, you may see some comparisons when reading these. If they offend you, I am sorry. I do not mean for them to, and will try to keep them as bland as possible. If you're still sore, feel free to write mean things about me in your online journals. That always helps me relieve stress. Or, punch me in the face. Seriously. If you're angry, I won't stop you.
Okay, Note Two:
I am not an insightful person. I agonized over these for hours before finally deciding to just write what I thought was coming from my heart (but what might very well have been coming from my right kidney.) As such, don't put too much stock into what I say. Regard me less as a prophet and more as one of those shallow online surveys which, based on a pattern of dots, decide the kind of person you are. I tried to be intelligent about this. I doubt it worked.
P.S. The actual hanky codes for Becky, for all those curious enough to want to know but lazy enough not to left click on the link and read several words, are as follows:
Kelly Green: This was proceded by the statement that Sam had made me add it. That is because Kelly Green hankies have something to do with whores, or role-playing as whores.
Kewpie doll: This one I picked, though. If you wear a Kewpie doll on your person it indicates a love of cuddling.
Okay, now onward to victory, Mule!
I think they're whispering "oil can."
That's how rusty I am.
I have been out of practice at this personal write-up thing for almost a year.
I hope it's more like riding a bike, and less like . . . uh . . . something that's hard to remember how to do after an extended period of not doing it.
Well, it seems my simile skills are up to snuff.
Er, what's next?
Yes, I return to the grind- the exhausting, daunting, depressing task of expounding on the character of my friends.
This Reverse quiz will be a re-hash of the oldest story in the world. That is to say, how great Andrew is. Humans have been writing on this subject since they first took charcoal bits to cave walls. That's the level of awesome Andrew has achieved: he pretty much transcends time.
But I'm getting ahead of myself.
I have touched upon the subject of Andrew before in this periodical, a little over two years ago.
You have to scroll down some distance, but it's here:
http://whiteytighties.blogspot.com/2004_07_01_whiteytighties_archive.html
Okay. Just a few quick announcements before we move on to our theatrical portion of the show.
First up is the matter of the Reverse Quiz itself.
Does anyone even remember what exactly is on it? On what scales do I judge you? What juicy tidbits you can expect?
So, before we go any further, let me give you a summary of my quiz formula.
01. I will write something about you. (No less than one paragraph length.)
02. I will then tell what song/movie remind me of you.
03. If I were to apply a time to you, it would be...
04. I will try to name a single word that best describes you. (Or, that failing, a half dozen words.)
05. I'll tell you one of the most memorable moments I've had with you.
06. I will tell you what animal you remind me of.
07. I'll then tell you something that I've always wondered about you.
08. I'll tell you which hanky signal you'd probably go by.
09. I will describe my ideal day with you.
10. I will tell you which villainous character actor you remind me of.
If any of you happen to remember the details of those reverse quizzes that were circulating the blogosphere a year or so ago, you'll notice that I devitated somewhat from the traditional model. So, in an attempt to preemptively halt all questions that I might be bombarded with later, here is a thorough explantaion of each item on my version of the quiz:
1. Self explanatory. Same as errbody else's, but longer than most.
2. I'm big on making things as explicit as possible. Perhaps it comes from the years of being misunderstood and subsequently villified, but whatever the reason, I go out of my way to explain what I say. One fish, two fish. Red fish, blue fish.
As such, when listing the songs you remind me of, I will include a description of the ditty, my reasons for picking it, and, occasionally, specific lyrics. Unlike my illustrious predecessors, I feel you shouldn't have to hunt for specifics on these.There is one other variation from the formula I am including. I realized that in order to do justice to this thing if more than one person is involved, you need to create some sort of similar scale. I needed something which would unite my readers and make them easier to describe. Thus, in addition to telling you which random song or songs you remind me of, I will tell you which Mike Doughty song you remind me of. This way I can capture your personalities more fully.
(One last note for this one: If you think about someone enough, every song you hear, and every movie you see, will remind you of him or her. So, while the tunes and films I pick have some relevance to who you are as a person, I choose them more because you're special to me and I think of you a lot.)
3. I over-did it on this one. When choosing time I picked not only an o'clock, but also a day, season, and month, and, in some cases, year.
4. Impossible. I did my best.
5. Ditto. Also, I probably held back on these.
6. Once again the universal scale approach. Aside from picking assorted animals of varying genus and species for y'all, I picked for each of you a dog that you remind me of.
7. Obviously held back on this one.
8. Yeah, the Hanky Signal.
The Hanky Code was a system of wordless, sartorial communication developed by the gay community, which has spread in limited amounts to the fetish world as a whole. It shows, by the color of the handkerchief you wear and its placement in one of several locations on your person, what your particular kink is. I declined to post explanations for these. Have fun looking them up and remember to clear your history when your done.
You know what's really funny? The code varies!
(I used this one: http://www.fetishexchange.org/hanky.shtml).
9. Might be partially based on actual events.10. You won't know who this is in many cases. Just "role" with it.
Good, I think that wraps it up.
Now, I realize it's been so long that any references to past posts are fairly moot, but here are some additions to an old Rerverse Quiz, Looney Tones, about my perennial Italian-ninja cohort, Anthony Celi.
There are but two items I need to touch on left over from the Tony's post.
The first, sadly, is a negative assessment of the poor fellow. In my write-up of him, though he asked me to take the gloves off and not pull any punches, I said almost nothing about his slightly less appealing character traits. At the time I was so enamored with the guy that I couldn't even see any faults, let alone bring myself to write about them. A few people even commented after reading that they could think of some bothersome qualities Tones possesses, and wondered why I hadn't included any. And so, now, for the sake of closure and completion, I will type about reasons why I do not like Tony. (This is, oddly enough, in spite of the fact that I do like him, and am closer to him now than ever.)
Tony can be stubborn. Annoyingly so. He is capable of digging his heels in further and with more tenacity than anyone I know. (It's as if he wear those ninja climbing foot-spikes all the time . . . in his mind!) One of my biggest problems with Tony is his absolute unyielding nature in the face of peer pressure. This contradicts strongly with his at times too-passive attitude in social situations. If Tony only wants to "go with the flow," God help the individual struggling to get him galvanized enough to make a decision. However, if he has his mind firmly set on something, save yourself hours of your life and give up trying to get him to change it.
Tony is a genius. Literally. Certified and saluted. As such, he has a right to be arrogant. He can, however, becoming sickeningly condescending sometimes. Not usually to me. I don't know if this is because he won't do it directly, or I choose not to see it, or-my favorite- he recognizes me as close to his own intelligence level. But I digress, to people he sees as intellectual inferiors- which is, rightfully- much of the population of planet Earth- he can be superior to the point of callousness. With me, his arrogance occasionally manifests itself in our arguments and debates, especially the petty ones, when he lowers himself to cruel jibes, which, when blended with his already assured air, become intolerable.
A side note from the above: Though this is no fault of Tony's, one thing I cannot stand is knowing more than him. The hierarchy is clear enough to me that any disruption of it becomes almost nauseating. So, if there is a fact Tony is ignorant of, yet I know because of my memory or voracious appetite for reading, it seems, well, just wrong somehow.
Tony is selfish. When it comes to creative collaberations, that is. The skits we wrote, for instance. He dominated them. In fact, to even use "we" to describe the force behind them is absurd. He wrote them. He didn't do it to earn more praise for himself, however. That's the infuriating part. He never wanted any credit for them. It'd be one thing if he pushed me out of the way to bask in the limelight. But as soon as the applause began, Tony tucked himself away in the corner. He does this often. With projects or good deeds. Does all the work, takes none of the credit. It's bothersome mostly because it makes so little sense.
Tony can be fussy and rule-bound. This intrudes in his competence as a host and his duties as a friend. I imagine his reverence for rules and boundaries- which he sometimes abandons to riotous results- is inherited from his parents; conditioned just as my hatred for rules and authority was by mine. Still, it can be discouraging.
For instance, the drinks in his fridge downstairs. Mentality in my house is always, in a lax way, you want something, have it. If my dad bought a bottle of soda for himself and my friends want some, take some. He'll happily buy another. The inherent boundaries of material possessions mean very little. And, in some ways Tony is like this. However, when my brother Sam asks for some cranberry juice, which Tony's parents use- I assume to make drinks- he is not just denied but reprimanded. I realize this is more a side-effect of the specific Celi household mentality, which is neither right nor wrong, merely different from mine, but Tony, as an unyielding instrument of that mentality, gains my scorn and disaffection.
And, at times, for whatever reason, Tony can slip up. We all do. What I mean is, in the very pure qualities that he exemplifies, that define what a magnificient person he is, he falls short. Happens to everyone. For instance: Tony had his house to himself this summer. I came over one night, between 10 and 11 I think it was, with a change of clothes and asked to use his shower. He appeared scandalized, and denied me access to his facilities. I admit, it might have been presumptuous on my part to act as I did. But, thing was, my house was undergoiing renovation and I had only ice-cold water coming out of my taps. I was working full-time in a grungy warehouse then, and just wanted to get clean. For Tony, normally the genial host, to not just deny my request, but appear insulted by it, was as harsh as a slap in the face. If Tony had come to my house, with my parents there, at 3 o'clock in the morning and asked the same of me I'd have drawn his goddamn bath for him.
Continuing in the bathroom theme: He gets angry when one does number two at his house. For fuck sake, it's a toilet! Tony could shit on my kitchen floor and I'd hold off on losing my temper.
. . .
I think that's all I got. What I guess I'm driving at is that Tony is a person and people are complex. Understandable, but nonetheless annoying and hurtful.
But, onto the good things:
Tony is a hard worker. I did not mention this in the his post. I greatly admire anyone who can apply themselves to a task, especially a physical one, and remain diligent. Tony isn't the strongest guy I know, and I tend to think of myself- rugged, powerful, slightly masochistic, with the work-ethic of an ox, as a hard worker. But Tony, in a quiet, unassuming way, can work just as hard and as doggedly as I do.
And the only other thing which needs mentioning is how thrilling it is sometimes to banter with Tony about the most esoteric subect matter imaginable. Whether it's bouncing quotations from Dexter's Lab or Johnny Bravo off one another or discussing obscure Spiderman villains, I cannot express how happy I am that Tony and I function on the same nerd wave-length. Tony is my friend, confidante, and pop-culture geequal, and I value this greatly.
Two final notes on the concept of Reverse Quizzes as a whole:
Note One:
When describing something it is often necessary to compare it to something else. When composing my Friends paragraphs, I held back as much as I could for fear that in complimenting one amigo I would insult the otro. In this series of personal write-ups, however, I have decided to take Caution, douse him in gasoline, light him on fire, piss on the ashes, and throw him to the wind. So, fair warning, you may see some comparisons when reading these. If they offend you, I am sorry. I do not mean for them to, and will try to keep them as bland as possible. If you're still sore, feel free to write mean things about me in your online journals. That always helps me relieve stress. Or, punch me in the face. Seriously. If you're angry, I won't stop you.
Okay, Note Two:
I am not an insightful person. I agonized over these for hours before finally deciding to just write what I thought was coming from my heart (but what might very well have been coming from my right kidney.) As such, don't put too much stock into what I say. Regard me less as a prophet and more as one of those shallow online surveys which, based on a pattern of dots, decide the kind of person you are. I tried to be intelligent about this. I doubt it worked.
P.S. The actual hanky codes for Becky, for all those curious enough to want to know but lazy enough not to left click on the link and read several words, are as follows:
Kelly Green: This was proceded by the statement that Sam had made me add it. That is because Kelly Green hankies have something to do with whores, or role-playing as whores.
Kewpie doll: This one I picked, though. If you wear a Kewpie doll on your person it indicates a love of cuddling.
Okay, now onward to victory, Mule!